Why the Spike hate?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe I'm crazy... but I still think Fury's comment "It is beyond my limited imagination to see a strong, independent, female character end up falling for a murderer who would be killling [sic] innocent people were he not suffering from chip affliction," can be applied to Angel as well. Just replace "chip" with "soul." I just don't see his comment as being anti-Spike as much as I see it being anti-vampire relationship.
 
I
InsaneMystic
absolutely.
S
StarSlayer
Also, I think Buffy fell in love with the man Spike was trying to become. I don't see how that is degrading her strong, independent self.
Maybe I'm crazy... but I still think Fury's comment "It is beyond my limited imagination to see a strong, independent, female character end up falling for a murderer who would be killling [sic] innocent people were he not suffering from chip affliction," can be applied to Angel as well. Just replace "chip" with "soul." I just don't see his comment as being anti-Spike as much as I see it being anti-vampire relationship.

Well, I think the soul has more weight than a chip, since Spike, for the most part of his chipped existence, still wanted to kill people. He just didn't have the physical ability to. Even at the end of Season Four, if I remember correctly, he tried to help Adam destroy the Scoobies and succeed with his plan. As much of a Spike fan I am (I swear I am! 😛), I think it may be incorrect to compare souled Angel to chipped Spike.

I'm not sure of Fury's stance on Angel, but it could be very possible that he was anti-vampire relationships as well. Didn't he have a Riley preference? 😕
 
Z
zobothehobo
Soulled Angel killed the WRH people. I guess it might be my ultra hatred of Angel talking... but I think in this case, they're pretty similar.
Taaroko
Taaroko
Completely agree that it is incorrect to compare souled Angel to chipped Spike. The best Angel(us) comparison to chipped Spike would be when Angelus was in that cage in Angel season four, and even that doesn't completely work.
S
StarSlayer
I definitely agree the soul has more weight than the chip.
Please tell me Joss never actually said those things about how rapists SHOULDN'T be demonized, because if he did, I will lose all respect for him and never, ever support another project he is involved with again.

---------- Post added at 07:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 PM ----------

Taaroko agrees: I think what he meant, if that's a real Joss quote, is that in reality, rapists aren't literally monsters, but human beings who do monstrous things. He didn't want to portray it as "monsters aren't real, therefore this doesn't happen in real life".

Ah, okay, thanks for clearing that up. I was about to be ill. >_<
 
Taaroko
Taaroko
I think what he meant, if that's a real Joss quote, is that in reality, rapists aren't literally monsters, but human beings who do monstrous things. He didn't want to portray it as "monsters aren't real, therefore this doesn't happen in real life".
Please tell me Joss never actually said those things about how rapists SHOULDN'T be demonized, because if he did, I will lose all respect for him and never, ever support another project he is involved with again.

He didn't. Specifically, he said that he felt Spike could be redeemed from trying to rape Buffy. Some people interpret that to mean that Joss was saying that rapists shouldn't be demonized, some don't.

Personally, I think the fact that Joss was not referring to real life is important to note. I don't believe he ever meant to say that rapists aren't monsters. In fact, I think he made that point very, very clear- for one, he made Spike and Angel (and I include Angel because they're both vampires on a mission of redemption who have raped in the past, not because of my personal shipping preferences) LITERAL monsters, fighting LITERAL demons within themselves. All the humans who have raped or intended to rape, like Warren for example, are treated appropriately as monsters as well. I think that says more about what Joss thinks about rapists than an ambiguous quotation does.

His point about redemption is consistent with his view of heroes/humanity in general, at least from what I've understood to be true. Both Spike and Angel are written as sympathetic characters, but I don't believe sympathizing with them means you're condoning or excusing rape. It means what they did was disgusting and horrifying, and it's that same horror that drives them to seek redemption. One could say the same about their other crimes, like murder and torture. While I believe rape is something entirely different from those two in how it functions as a brutal and misogynistic (typically; though yes, not all victims of rape are women) crime, it is still similarly inhuman.

For the record, I am (still) bitter and angry at Joss for reducing an issue like rape to a cheap plot device. That's lazy writing and it's profoundly anti-feminist. I'm not excusing him for that, but I do think what he said in this instance has been taken out of context. Feel free to hate on Joss for whatever you want though.
 
M
mayfever
your last sentence. Oh so very much.
Z
zobothehobo
[No message]
S
StarSlayer
I love this post :)
W
WakingNightmare
[No message]
T
The Unspoken
Great post!
I completely agree that they used the rape as a cheap plot device. It shouldn't have been there to begin with, and is a very serious issue that shouldn't have been in the show at all. For someone like Joss who claims to be a feminist, I found that to be a very poor choice on his part. Someone very close to me was raped, that's why the scene upsets me so much, and I have such strong feelings about the whole situation.
 
Maybe I'm crazy... but I still think Fury's comment "It is beyond my limited imagination to see a strong, independent, female character end up falling for a murderer who would be killling [sic] innocent people were he not suffering from chip affliction," can be applied to Angel as well. Just replace "chip" with "soul." I just don't see his comment as being anti-Spike as much as I see it being anti-vampire relationship.
Very true. I've definitely come to see the chip as equal to the Bad Hair Guy's soul (i.e., a muzzle), while Spike's soul went beyond that, to the category of tool (which the BHG imho never reached).

I can just repeat how strongly S6 Spuffy reminds me of Bangel, minus the softening lense of romancey delusion, and I just can't grasp how someone can hate Spike if not hating that other guy much, much more.

So, if you're crazy, Zo, you definitely share my brand of insanity... 😉
 
Z
zobothehobo
Looks like our brains merged again?
S
StarSlayer
I'm with the crazies too, lol! :D
W
WakingNightmare
[No message]
Personally, I think the fact that Joss was not referring to real life is important to note. I don't believe he ever meant to say that rapists aren't monsters.

Wasn't he? He describes Spike as a "human being", which Spike is...not. He could have said that Spike isn't responsible for what he did while soulless but no, he says he wanted to make a point about human beings, hence about real life. Fair enough, although, I am totally confused what the point is since he says that "their relationship should come to a place of trust." And yet he says also: "Without saying "Okay, now they're going to become lovers again", because I think that would be wrong." Contradictory much? So they are going to have a relationship but they are not going to become lovers? Huh? Just friends, right Joss? Yet later in the commentary he says: "I wanted them [Spike and Buffy] – I wanted whatever you want to have happened, to have happened. If people believe that on their last night together they made love, great! So it's wrong to say they are going to become an item again but if someone wants to believe that's great? Indecisive much? Oh, wait, you couldn't piss off the other shipping faction, gotcha mister "I never care what fans want, honest!"...

All the humans who have raped or intended to rape, like Warren for example, are treated appropriately as monsters as well.

Hello, Andrew? Jonathan? Faith?
 
Please tell me Joss never actually said those things about how rapists SHOULDN'T be demonized, because if he did, I will lose all respect for him and never, ever support another project he is involved with again.
Demonizing anyone is always wrong, period. This reminds me of the neverending debate in German media about whether Hitler and the other Nazi high-ups should be portrayed as human beings in film and TV (as, e.g., in Der Untergang/Downfall), and my stance has always been that this is the only responsible way they can be portrayed. Demonizing Hitler is undermining the horror of the Holocaust and WW2, and increasing the danger of a historical repetition. Likewise, demonizing sex offenders undermines the very human horror of sexual violence and increases the risk of it happening.

So, if Joss said that, more power to him!
 
Z
zobothehobo
[No message]
M
mayfever
first time I agree with you on something I think :D
Hello, Andrew? Jonathan? Faith?

Whoops. Caught me on that. Willow, Andrew, Jonathan, Faith also fit that criteria, yes. But Joss & Co. seem to only consider aggressive physical rape and mind control sex slavery (clearly mind control, not memory erasure) as rape, so I didn't count Willow and Faith because the show never seemed to consider what they did as rape/attempted rape in the first place. I also didn't count Andrew and Jonathan cause the way they're portrayed in 'Dead Things' with Katrina, the show seemed like it's trying to say that because those two had a problem with Katrina's rape, they're not condemnable as attempted rapists. I still consider it all gross and I'm way, way disappointed in Joss for doing this, but I wrote my post operating on how the show itself framed the issue of rape. Which is still wrong. My bad.

(I have problems with Joss's feminism. -___-) Bleh.
 
Kean
Kean
You mean Whedon's complete underscoring of feminism? Yeah...problems is a very small word for what I have with his particular brand of "feminism". Bleh indeed.
G
goodbyetonight
So do I, especially since I consider myself a sort of (not one of the rahhhh I hate all men) feminist. I just feel that he was very inconsistent with some of his choices.
(I have problems with Joss's feminism. -___-) Bleh.

You know.. I used to foolishly call myself a feminist several years ago. I had a few feminist friends and what not and no one EVER called me on it. Then this chick from OZ really called me out. She laughed and said no man could ever be a feminist because we are not women. Said I could be sympathetic towards the plight, etc, but any man that calls himself a feminist is deluded and actually detracts from the cause. Because if a man can experience everything a female does, than the actual female emotions/struggle/experience is decreased. Regardless of my understanding about the double standards I cannot experience them. I cannot be a feminist as I cannot be female (well, in theory with an operation I could but I aint going there and I really would not be a female anyway as the vast majority of my life experiences would still be skewed as a man). I can however support feminism and the struggle for equality.

I know this is off topic but.. I thought it was worthwhile.
 
P
prophecygrrl
Lol, expect a PM about male feminism from me soon :D
Demonizing anyone is always wrong, period. This reminds me of the neverending debate in German media about whether Hitler and the other Nazi high-ups should be portrayed as human beings in film and TV (as, e.g., in Der Untergang/Downfall), and my stance has always been that this is the only responsible way they can be portrayed. Demonizing Hitler is undermining the horror of the Holocaust and WW2, and increasing the danger of a historical repetition. Likewise, demonizing sex offenders undermines the very human horror of sexual violence and increases the risk of it happening.

So, if Joss said that, more power to him!

It's an interesting point, but I guess the issue there is that in portraying such hateful characters/people as human beings, there's a line in how sympathetic you can make those characters. It can also be problematic in that if that line is crossed, it can privilege the viewpoint of the evil person and consequently dismiss the suffering of their victims. I don't feel like that was done with Spike personally, but there are plenty who do. And I understand that, to an extent.
 
I don't think the question is why the hate...I think the real question is why the love? I certainly don't hate Spike but I would say there are more people that unconditionally love him than there are those who hate him. Seriously, I'm pretty sure I've never seen a comparable fan base blindly love a character as much as Spike fans love Spike. And that's fine, I know there are reasons to love him, I just can't relate to it because I don't completely love characters like that.
 
P
prophecygrrl
You're welcome to make your own thread about that :) If you can deal with the fandom debates, LOL. :D
A
A Flawed Fashion
very good point. There is good and bad about Spike and both sides are important to be seen.
S
sylvanscribe
[No message]
^I think there's actually already a thread on that topic b/c I posted in it when I first joined the BB, lol! 😀 (unless it reached it limit or got closed)

Taaroko agrees: Not without admitting that it's the moral of Spuffy and then taking it beyond that to a ridiculous extreme, you couldn't. 😛

Don't get me started on my beloved Spuffy! 😀 Ridiculous extreme? Hehe...please 😛 😉
 
Taaroko
Taaroko
*evil grin*
First of all, Spike is my favorite character (Buffy is second), so I'm not one of the fans who can explain the Spike hate. But on the other hand, as a Spike fan, I want to try to answer to the Spike hate because I know where I disagree 😉 And the post of Taaroko (page 10) is the perfect opportunity to do this, because you put in words very well your reasons and I want to explain why I see it differently and why I strongly disagree, point by point. Of course, this is just my opinion, and I just want to show another way of seeing it.

And before to beggin, I want to remind that English isn't my maternal language, so I apologize for all the awful mistakes I will do in this post. But I hope that my arguments will be enough coherent and understandable 😱 (and I hope too that I translated/ understood your words in the right way, lol).

Spike is a jerk, with or without his soul. And considering how intuitive he seems to be, there's no excuse for it. His insensitive remarks aren't made carelessly like Cordelia's or cluelessly like Anya's, they're deliberate. He phrases his comments in a blunt and insulting way, even when the point he makes with them is insightful (or perhaps especially then). This may be entertaining, but that's only from the perspective of an audience member. To the other characters (who, unlike Spike, are the actual protagonists), it isn't so funny, and I'm surprised they were all able to take his crap for so long without staking him. The endearing moments weren't enough to make up for it and generally made everything else seem worse by comparison. Also, does he ever treat anyone he's meeting for the first time in a non-hostile fashion? I can't recall a single time that he didn't open with hostility.

First point of disagreement. I think it came from a different perspective and way of interpret it, but to me, we have to go to the beggining. Spike, as William, and as a young vampire, wasn't that much sarcastic or wasn't doing as many sarcastic comments. He was sweet, respectful, and attentionate.

What did he gets in return ? Mockery, indifference, laughter.

The way Spike is acting now came with time, during all these years with Drusilla, Angelus and Darla. Spike was still able to love his mother after he turned into a vampire. But, as we see in Lies my parents told me, his mother wasn't. He was hurt and jealous when Angelus slept with Drusilla, Angelus mocked him for his weakness.

What I'm trying to say is : Spike built a carapace through the years. He tries to play a role. This is not really wickedness, it actually is a protection. An apparence and protection he built for a long, long time. This is the way he acts, because he has been hurt a LOT of time when he opened himself to people as a sensitive and romantic guy. What did you expect ? The way he is now is perfectly and totally logical in my opinion.

By the time of Sunnydale, this "˜weakness', his feelings, are shown with people he trusts. Like Buffy in "End of days" or "Afterlife". This is how it works for him now. And this is always his sensitive point.

His way of acting and being in contact with people is just marked by his emotional bagage. And I love him for that.

He's not a bad guy, people just have to go through the surface for knowing him. Like Buffy did. Like Dawn did. Like Fred did. It's just his way of being, because of his story. And I really like it.


At the same time that the snark starts really getting old for me (season five), other aspects of Spike's behavior start to seriously freak me out. His "love" (and I use sarcastic quote marks) for Buffy manifests in sabotaging her relationship with Riley (not that I was sorry to see it end) and several varieties of intensely creepy stalking. And while I'm on that subject, since someone else brought it up and I don't want to let it go unaddressed, I don't think his stalking compares at all to whatever Angel(us) did. Angelus was stalking her as a predator stalks his prey for the purpose of messing with her head, and Angel's "lurking" was out of a desire to make sure she was okay and, occasionally, to pass information to her. Spike, on the other hand, goes sneaking around nicking her knickers, making a creepy shrine, and using Harmony to indulge in creepy fantasies (I can't stand Harmony either, but I still felt awful for her during those scenes). And then he surpasses all previously known definitions of creepy by threatening Warren into making a robot version of her, and having sex with it. I cannot express my horrified disgust strongly enough.

Here again, I disagree (and I agree on some levels). I have to clarify briefly how I see Spike during this period of the show. To me, this a vampire who's able to love, but who is stuck between two parts of him. A demon part and an human part. He doesn't get everything who makes a human. But he has a lot of differences with the other demons. Spike is stuck between two worlds, and he doesn't find a place. He doesn't fit anywhere.

At the beggining, he started killing slayers in order to impress Drusilla. Here again, love was a motivation. He chose his way because of this. When he discovered his feelings for Buffy, he was able to make everything for her. But at the beggining of season 5, it wasn't an healthy way of loving. It was more obsessive and a very "˜vampire' way of loving, more selfish. But the more time passes, the more he discovers that his feelings are real, sincere and more than just selfish.

Because of his love for Buffy, he begins slowly to change himself, almost in despite of his will. All what he's doing can seem selfish and disgusting at the beggining, and I understand that, but I strongly and firmly believe that everyone is entitled to a second chance.

What I love about Spike is : he does a lot of mistakes, but he learns from these mistakes (not every character could pretend the same"¦).

Intervention was an HUGE turning point for his character, and for his relationship with Buffy. He does something real, altruistic. He didn't want to bring a pain to the person he loves. It is anything but selfish. At this point, Buffy and each fan know that it's more than just an obsession, but actually a real love.

He didn't always act in the right way (it wasn't his role to open Buffy's eyes for Riley's fate, but this secret should be say anyway), but he evolves with time. He changes, and came to a point where he's lost between these two parts of himself I was talking about.

My favorites lines who express better what I'm trying to say :

SPIKE: Just 'cause she's confused about where she fits in, I'm supposed to be too? 'Cause I'm not. (pacing back and forth) I know what I am. I'm dangerous. I'm evil.
WOMAN: (scared) I-I'm sure you're not evil.
SPIKE: Yes, I am. I am a killer. (moves closer to her) That's what I do. I kill.

(Smashed, 6x09)

Okay, when you read this, don't you have the impression that he tries to convince himself ? I love Drew Z. Greenberg comment of the episode. Basically, he was saying that this scene generates one question : does he want to bite her ? Or to convince himself that he wants to bite her ? At this point, is he good or bad ? He doesn't know it himself. He tries to bite the girl because he thinks the chip doesn't work, and he wants to prove to Buffy and to himself that he can still be someone. Good, bad, whatever, he wants an identity. Because, let's face it, he's not a vampire anymore. And he's not a human. Where did he belong ?

Changes are strongly rooted in him. There's no way to go back.

Later, again in Smashed :

SPIKE: Oh, poor little lost girl. She doesn't fit in anywhere. She's got no one to love.
BUFFY: Me? I'm lost ? Look at you, you idiot ! Poor Spikey. Can't be a human, can't be a vampire. Where the hell do you fit in ?

Season 6 is a lot about Buffy's depression, but Spike was as much lost as she was. But Buffy is the heroine, so they have more insisted on her case. That's a part of the reasons why they find each other and felt connected (on this point).

Again, we find this duality in Seeing Red. The attempted rape is absolutely awful, but it shows again this contrast good/bad in Spike. The human part in him is completely in love with her, but the demon part doesn't see the limits.

The human part was in love with Buffy and pushed him to do beautiful things, like looking after Dawn, helping her friends during 5 months, and trying to do his better for her. But the demon part is still here, somewhere, and even if his evolution permits to him to be better, trying to fight his nature, he's still a vampire on a lot of aspects. Marti Noxon said it very well :

He sort of represents Buffy's other side. He's her id. He's hang dog because he loves Buffy, and he's not been getting his way. But in some ways I think he's the most powerful. And he's constantly struggling with his nature, which is also a part of Buffy's character arc. So, to me, he is heroic in the Buffy universe, because he's right there representing what the show's about, which is the struggle to be a hero and the other part of you that wants to drag ya on down into the abyss. -- Marti Noxon (Metro, 9-02)


A part of him tries to be an hero, and the other part of him wants to drag him into the abyss.

When Spike came in the bathroom in Seeing Red, initially, he came to apologize to her. He talks to her about feelings and love. It was a desperate action. And we know that he's sincere.

But he still doesn't get where are the limits. When he came back to his crypt, AGAIN, we see this duality. Spike realizes what he has done. He's angry at him, he feels culpability and remorses (and it's really not common for a soulless vampire). He doesn't support the idea of what he has done to the woman he loves. This ? It's the human part of him who blames the demon part of him.

And there, exactly, at this moment, he decides to make a choice. He goes to recover his soul. Recover his humanity. He goes in Africa for destroying the demon part in him ; the demon part who pushes him to cross the boundary and to hurt the woman he loves. No duality anymore. With this soul, he has an indentity. He just... makes a choice. And it's just amazing from a soulless vampire.

That's why I don't understand fans who think that he goes in Africa for remove the chip. It's *really* a nonsense to me, when we look at his journey.

So, back to your post and the quote, about the Buffybot and all what you're qualifying like "˜disgusting things' : I understand, but I don't see it in the same way than you. Because Spike changes with time, and the more he loves Buffy, the less this "˜disgusting' attitudes are present (more specifically after Intervention). Even if he keeps to do mistakes (trying to keep her in the dark, get rid Katrina's body"¦). He learns, he does mistakes, he fell, and he learns again. That's life, and we CAN'T expect perfection from a soulless vampire who tries to change in better.

He TRIES. That's an amazing thing.

Judging on the bad is always easier"¦


...No thanks to Spike. He takes advantage of her alienation from her friends and her fear that she came back wrong to drag her into the darkness with him, because he knows he can only get at her when she's alone and vulnerable. All while calling it love. Last season he tried to make her admit to some tiny speck of feelings for him by threatening to sic Drusilla on her if she didn't. This season he tries to convince her that having sex with him means she loves him. He doesn't care if she hates herself, so long as she loves him. If she *has* to hate herself in order to love him, that works too. And he can't accept that she doesn't. He doesn't want her to be happy, he wants her to be *his*. Once again, he's soulless, so it's not like it would be logical to expect better of him, but it's still appalling, especially when he claims to have changed.

Word to my precedent comment, he's as much lost as Buffy is. He has proven a lot of times that he wanted her to be happy even if it means that he has to suffer or die (and he's glad to see her happy in Hell's Bells), but when it came to their relationship in season 6, it was a spiral. Bad emotional context. Spike isn't perfect. Like Buffy isn't. Like Willow isn't. Like Xander isn't. Too bad. Move on.


Then comes the soul quest. I don't believe for a second that he wants to get his soul back because he feels remorse, because you *can't* feel remorse without a soul, dangit! What I do believe is that he feels frustrated to his wit's end that nothing he tries with Buffy works and all he's succeeded in doing is making her hate him and possibly even be willing to kill him at last, but he does know that having a soul worked for Angel (and continued to do so even after a period of soullessness), so he thinks that it must therefore also work for him (never considering that there may have been many other things about Angel that worked for him apart from the mere fact of soulfulness). He still wants to force Buffy to love him, but now he knows that he's crossed a line, and the only way to get around that is to get a soul. He knows she won't hold him responsible for what he just did anymore if he has one.

At the beggining, I didn't even want to answer to this because it makes me totally"¦ huh ?! I can't express enough how much it makes me perplex to read something like this, because I don't even *understand* how anyone can seriously think a second about this hypothesis.

"Oh, Buffy doesn't want me anymore because of what I've done. Too bad. I will get my soul because, hey, it works for Angel ! Maybe it will work for me !"

Please.


Spike's journey was PERFECTLY logical since a long time. He's lost between two worlds.

SPIKE : It won't let me be a monster. And I can't be a man. I'm nothing.

(Seeing Red, 6x19)

Like I was saying previously, Spike wants an identity. The attempted rape has been an electroshock, because he tried to change, but his demon part bring him back to his most terrible mistakes. And he doesn't want it anymore. He has hurt the woman he loves ; there's not better motivation.

When Spike goes to Africa, he's looking for an identity.

And on this point :

because you *can't* feel remorse without a soul

And the flashbacks ? And his anger ? It was put here just like that ?

And what do you think of a vampire who prefer to die rather than hurt the person he loves by saying to a crazy Godess about the key ? What do you think about a vampire who cries (more than anybody else) after the death of the woman he loves? And who keeps crying during 5 months ? And who dreams every night that he saved her ? And who counted every day since her death ? And who keeps his promise whereas he has nothing to earn in return ?

Spike has done a lot of mistakes. He's not perfect. But he has done a lot of good stuff too. He tries to be better and he failed sometimes.

But he tried.


The entire series of attempts to force Buffy to love him or to admit that she loves him is strongly reminiscent of his attempts to do the same to Drusilla in the earlier seasons, with *forcing* the woman in question to feel something they don't necessarily feel being the recurring theme. Why he expected it to work on a Slayer who has hated him for years when it didn't work on a crazy soulless vampire who'd already been with him for over a century, I will never understand.

I don't really like the Spike & Dru relationship, so I have to say that I pretty much don't care about it. But there's something I want to make clear. He has tried to manipulate Dru's feelings by a a potion in season 3. That's not True Love to me, because he's ready to accept Drusilla with a lobotomized brain. Like if he wasn't loving her for who she is. That was a very vampire way of loving at this point.

Spike is maybe insistent with Buffy, because he felt something strong when he was with her. During all the beggining of the season, it's Buffy who comes to him and makes confidences to him. In OMWF, he was singing : "Let me rest in peace", but again, it's Buffy who goes after him. And during all this season, the more she gives him hopes, the more he wants something in return from her. After all, he's a man in love and when they broke up, he suffers of the situation. That's normal.

The difference with his love with Dru is, he suffers a lot, but even if he wants Buffy, even if she rejects him, he won't doing a spell or anything like that to her. He just tries to do something to him, that's what we see in Entropy :

***

SPIKE: Right then. Got something that'll dull the ache a bit?
ANYA: (smiling) Actually, yes. (walks back behind the counter) Um, Giles left a couple of supplies here, and I think ... this might help.

She bends over, begins rummaging in the cabinet under the cash register.

ANYA: Eases the hurt ... makes the sun shine a little brighter, (Spike frowning) even makes boring people seem more interesting. Ah. Here.

***

He doesn't force anything, he tries to move on with all the help possible, even if it's hard and even if he has to use magic.

And here again, when he sleeps with Anya, Buffy is hurt. Whereas she was asking to him to move on. Why would she be hurt is she hadn't feelings for him ?


But soulful Spike gives me his own reasons not to like him. I heartily agree with whoever said they don't believe he feels remorse, he just feels sorry for himself. Now that he actually *has* a soul, he realizes that he had no idea what he was signing up for by getting one, and clearly regrets it for a while. But then he slides from that back into the attitude of the old Spike and denies responsibility and guilt. If this is just his way of dealing with the guilt he really does feel, then he needs a new way of dealing, because this one is immature, something a being well into his second century of existence has no business being as often as Spike is.


Spike has his own way of dealing with remorses, and he has still a lot to learn. If he was doing it like Angel does, it would have been redondant, and honestly, brooding isn't a Spike's thing. He moves on, constantly. Maybe it's not the better way of dealing with it, but few months after he gets his soul, he deals with it like he can.

Angel had 100 years for finding his way. He didn't exactly play the Champion role during all this time"¦ he was eating rats, lying in the garbages, and trying to not kill someone because of his vampire instincts.

Spike needed time. That's all.

I don't think he doesn't feel remorses. Actually, to be fair, remorses made him crazy until Him (7x06). But Buffy helped him and he deals with it differently after that.

Shooting script of "Never leave me" (7x09) :

BUFFY : "There's a man in there underneath that monster. A man who -- even when he had no soul -- struggled to find redemption. You're alive because I know he's in there, and I believe in the man he can be."


She gives him faith, and she gives him the proof of her faith in him. She proves that she sees the man behind the monster, even when he has no soul, because it's this man who fought for his soul, and she believes in *this* man.

At this point, Spike handle his guilt differently. He knows he has done mistakes, but he also knows he can't change the past.

Maybe you find this way of dealing with guilt immature, I just think it's a way of dealing with it for beggining. Few months after the recovery of his soul, it's just this. Time can make things different. We see in AtS that he begins to be different on this point.

If you give to Angel 100 years for finding his way, I think that one year is the minimum you can give to Spike.

What he says to Wood about Nikki is beyond horrible, and I was astonished to see Buffy defend this unapologetic creep against the son of a fellow Slayer he murdered and Giles, to the extent of threatening the former and creating a permanent breach in her relationship with the latter. Spike has successfully manipulated her into feeling responsible for his soul. Ugh. She picked a terrible reason to finally start standing up to her friends. No, soulful Spike does not deserve to die for soulless Spike's murder of Nikki Wood or anyone else, but Robin at least has as much reason for hating Spike and wanting to avenge his mother's death as Giles had for hating Angel in season three, and Buffy wasn't objecting then, even though Angel was extremely remorseful but Spike isn't at all.

Spike has successfully manipulated her into feeling responsible for his soul.' => Seriously ?

And don't you think that it was just because she was in love (or falling in love at least) with him, rather than a malicious "˜manipulation' ?

Spike didn't go recover his soul for putting a weight in Buffy's shoulders. Actually, he didn't even wanted to say to her that he has recover his soul at the beggining. And it wasn't his goal when he left Sunnydale. He wanted to be right to Buffy (instead of hurting the woman he loves). And it was a quest for an identity, and because he KNEW that it was the right thing to do. This is what he's saying in Destiny : "I fought for my soul. Went through the demon trials. Almost did me in a dozen times over, but I kept fighting. 'Cause I knew it was the right thing to do."

I really don't blame Wood for what he has tried. Because he has reasons for doing this. But his attempt to kill Spike was stupid. He knows that Spike has a soul, he knows that he changed. But he volontary brings back the bad Spike, the vampire part in him, with the song Early one morning, in order to kill him.

Spike has equally reasons to be angry, like Buffy has reasons to be. Spike really don't need to feel compassion at this point for a guy who just tried to kill him without valid reason at this moment of his life.

I don't think that Spike would have reacted in an insensitive way if he had know it in another way.


Okay, "Chosen". Spike gets hailed all over the place for his heroic sacrifice in this one. Why? This is probably a case of where the fandom's interpretation annoys me more than Spike does. He had no idea what the amulet was going to do. None of them did. If they had, they could have just sent Spike into the Hellmouth by himself and not risked anyone else dying. (That's why I hate plot devices like the amulet. They make the efforts of everyone else seem pointless.) All Spike thought he was signing up for was certain death in battle, just like the others. Points for that, of course, but no more than Buffy and Faith get, and less than non-superpowered humans like Xander and Dawn get. Once the amulet fires up, can he even move? Every time I watch that scene, it looks to me like he's kind of immobilized. Dying to save the world was never what he chose to do at a point when he actually had a choice. He merely accepts what's unavoidable, so"¦whatever. He goes on to undermine his own sacrifice in "Just Rewards", when he tries to blame Angel for his death and delivers that "I don't give a piss about atonement" line. Which means that even *he* is far from considering it a selfless act of heroism, so I don't understand why so many fans insist that that's what it was.

If Spike wanted to, he would have remove the amulet and would have follow Buffy, like she was asking. But he didn't.

He chose to die, because he was feeling he needed to do this. Because he knew the World needed him to do this. And because he wanted to save the woman he loves. Actually, it was a pretty selfless act of heroism. Shooting script of Chosen :

SPIKE
No you don't. But thanks for saying it.

A big quake rocks them. Spike pushes her away.


SPIKE (cont'd)
It's your world up there. Now GO!


"It's your world up there". He gives her the life she always wanted and deserved. He proves to her that she was right to have faith in him. (And he tries to make her leave several times).

But I agree that Spike is an anti-hero. At this point, I'm not sure he really cared about World's fate (Buffy's safety is his first preoccupation and he does it because he knows it has to be done), but he does the best choice. And he becomes a Champion. A Champion who still needs to find his way.

The fight in "Destiny" might be my least favorite soulful Spike moment of all. He not only rejects responsibility for his actions while soulless (only the evil ones, mind you, because he can totally take credit for just the good ones without being a hypocrite), but he actually blames them on Angel. By his own logic, this doesn't make sense. If he isn't guilty of his soulless actions (which he isn't, I agree), then Angel darn well isn't responsible for the actions of Angelus, let alone the actions of Spike. He also says some extremely disrespectful things about Buffy, shoving his season six "relationship" with her in Angel's face. So is he only sorry about what he put her through when she's actually present? This is how he talks about the woman he supposedly loves? I never believed he really loved her before he got his soul, but I did think that changed once he had it. This scene would suggest otherwise.

Spike has years, and years, and years of hate of Angel(us) behind him. Because of Dru, because of Buffy, because of the way he treated his feelings and humiliated him"¦ It's ANGEL who begins to talk about Buffy, in order to HURT Spike. It was volunteer from his part. And he does it in the baddest way possible, because he knows Spike's insecurities when it comes to Buffy's feelings (and Angel knows that Spike was important to Buffy, she said it herself to him). Spike is in love with Buffy and he respects her ; that was the exception. I disliked it in "Destiny", but it was an exception in the middle of a fight between two old vampires. Because he was trying to hurt Angel as much as Angel was hurting him. In this context, it was understandable.

He never talked about what he had with Buffy in season 7. He never talked about the « I love you » moment. He keeps the most important and intimate for himself. Because it's not Angel's business. He respects what he and Buffy really had by keeping it for himself.

But I have to say that I'm not a big fan of season 5 of ATS, because even if Spike and Angel interractions were funny, it definitely wasn't the Spike and Angel I love...
 
S
StarSlayer
I fricken' ADORE this post!!!! :D Pure brilliance!!! But, I do love AtS s5, lol!
P
prophecygrrl
You deserve all the karma for this post :D :D
First point of disagreement. I think it came from a different perspective and way of interpret it, but to me, we have to go to the beggining. Spike, as William, and as a young vampire, wasn't that much sarcastic or wasn't doing as many sarcastic comments. He was sweet, respectful, and attentionate.

What did he gets in return ? Mockery, indifference, laughter.

The way Spike is acting now came with time, during all these years with Drusilla, Angelus and Darla. Spike was still able to love his mother after he turned into a vampire. But, as we see in Lies my parents told me, his mother wasn't. He was hurt and jealous when Angelus slept with Drusilla, Angelus mocked him for his weakness.

What I'm trying to say is : Spike built a carapace through the years. He tries to play a role. This is not really wickedness, it actually is a protection. An apparence and protection he built for a long, long time. This is the way he acts, because he has been hurt a LOT of time when he opened himself to people as a sensitive and romantic guy. What did you expect ? The way he is now is perfectly and totally logical in my opinion.

By the time of Sunnydale, this "˜weakness', his feelings, are shown with people he trusts. Like Buffy in "End of days" or "Afterlife". This is how it works for him now. And this is always his sensitive point.

His way of acting and being in contact with people is just marked by his emotional bagage. And I love him for that.

Okay, I think I can understand where you're coming from here. But really, we're back to "jerkiness is Spike's defense mechanism", and it still isn't one that endears him to me once he has a soul. At this point, he's just perpetuating the need to remain guarded by being hostile towards people, and it makes him seem unpleasantly cynical.

Also, I have trouble sympathizing with who he is underneath the jerkiness, because after three seasons of (usually) tough, hardcore Spike, seeing him being sensitive and emotionally fragile in the William flashbacks mostly just seemed pathetic and weak. I know I could probably be a little more understanding about that, and who knows? Maybe I'll find the sympathy when I get to that part in my current rewatch.

He's not a bad guy, people just have to go through the surface for knowing him. Like Buffy did. Like Dawn did. Like Fred did. It's just his way of being, because of his story. And I really like it.

Yes, he is a bad guy, actually. Until he has a soul, he's a bad guy by default.

Here again, I disagree (and I agree on some levels). I have to clarify briefly how I see Spike during this period of the show. To me, this a vampire who's able to love, but who is stuck between two parts of him. A demon part and an human part. He doesn't get everything who makes a human. But he has a lot of differences with the other demons. Spike is stuck between two worlds, and he doesn't find a place. He doesn't fit anywhere.

Because of his love for Buffy, he begins slowly to change himself, almost in despite of his will. All what he's doing can seem selfish and disgusting at the beggining, and I understand that, but I strongly and firmly believe that everyone is entitled to a second chance.

And here's where you lose me completely. How can Spike be different? What's this "human part" you think he has? He's soulless! He might still have William's mind and body, but the only inherently good human part is the soul, which he lacks. What's important to remember is that Spike is a hopeless romantic poet under that hardened shell. That's something I believe was able to carry over after he was vamped because it's more part of the mind than the soul. He isn't able to love--not truly and selflessly, because he lacks the required component, but he thinks he can because he can't feel the difference and he's able to romanticize his relationship with Drusilla. He likes the idea of having this big eternal love with her, so he lives it that way, for all the good it does him in the end. In seasons five and six, he likes the idea of being the heroic love interest--it's either that or continue being the reluctant wise-cracking sidekick, so, really tough choice there--and he tries to live it.

But the fact remains throughout that he has no soul. He cannot be selfless. He creates a persona in order to fit into this role he wants, and he tries to live it that way. He is obsessed with Buffy and wants her, but that isn't how he'd want to describe his feelings to himself, because it's not romantic enough. Instead, he plays it up to be this great love that changes him. Not having a soul, he still wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway, but once again, it's not real selfless love. He's so used to wearing one mask, that of the tough Big Bad, that by now it's easy for him to convince himself that the mask is who he really is. But it's not, and neither is this new mask.

It is impossible for him to truly change for the better at any deeper level than the surface because HE DOESN'T HAVE A SOUL. And would it really be better if he could? That would completely undermine all of the vamp lore of the Buffyverse. Souls=capacity for selflessness and goodness. Soulless demon=inherently evil. Which is why Buffy can stake vampires left and right without it being an ethical issue. If Spike can "evolve" to the point where he can be selfless and good without a soul, what's the point of a soul? And how do you justify all of the evil he did and still does? If he had it in him all along to change for the better, then you can't give him a pass for his evil just because he's soulless. And what about Buffy? Has she been slaying potential anti-heroes all this time?

If you try to make Spike into an exception, the entire Buffyverse falls apart. I can see why you'd want to allow him the capacity for real change, but I'm not willing to ignore the rules of the 'verse for one character.

That's why I don't understand fans who think that he goes in Africa for remove the chip. It's *really* a nonsense to me, when we look at his journey.

I thought that too before I listened to the commentary on that episode. His dialogue and his attitude are hostile and angry, and he talks about the chip the way he used to talk about it when he tried to get it out. The writers meant to misdirect us into thinking he was going to get the chip out, and then--TWIST ENDING!--he was really getting his soul. For a lot of people, they were a little too convincing with the misdirect, which is why many still refuse to believe he was after his soul. I accept that it was a misdirect, but there's still the reality of his behavior leading up to getting his soul, which is why, to me, it seems like a very radical interpretation of the text when people try to assign selfless motives to his quest. He might be trying to get a soul, but he's still soulless right up until he has it!

The identity crisis is a very intriguing idea, though, I'll give you that much. It was always extremely important to Spike to belong somewhere. With Dru, with the Fanged Four, then when he had no other choice, with the Scoobies and Buffy. If they--more importantly, she--keep rejecting him, then he'll eventually resort to the one thing he thinks will work: a soul. (Still not a selfless motive, incidentally. Wanting to find a place might be a very sympathetic motive, but it isn't a selfless one, because it's something he wants for himself.)

I don't really like the Spike & Dru relationship, so I have to say that I pretty much don't care about it. But there's something I want to make clear. He has tried to manipulate Dru's feelings by a a potion in season 3. That's not True Love to me, because he's ready to accept Drusilla with a lobotomized brain. Like if he wasn't loving her for who she is. That was a very vampire way of loving at this point.

My point in bringing up what he did with Drusilla is that she was someone with whom he claimed to have this great eternal love. He whole-heartedly believed that this was real and true and forever--at the exact same time that he was contemplating using a love spell on her. This proves that he does not understand what real love is, even while he claims to have it. As I've said before, he can't understand it because he's soulless, which remains true through the end of season six. True, he doesn't try to do a spell on Buffy, but he still tries to force her to love him. Because he's soulless. Wooing her properly is beyond him.

And here again, when he sleeps with Anya, Buffy is hurt. Whereas she was asking to him to move on. Why would she be hurt is she hadn't feelings for him ?

There is a broad spectrum of "feelings" one can have before they get to love. What she tells him in "As You Were" is the truth. She wants him, but she can't love him.

Maybe you find this way of dealing with guilt immature, I just think it's a way of dealing with it for beggining. Few months after the recovery of his soul, it's just this. Time can make things different. We see in AtS that he begins to be different on this point.

If you give to Angel 100 years for finding his way, I think that one year is the minimum you can give to Spike.

In all the hundred years it took Angel to find his way, he never sneered in the face of people affected by what he'd done, and he still doesn't. He respects them. Even Holtz! Spike does not show the same respect to anyone affected by his soulless actions except Buffy. Not until "Damage", but I have to watch the season and a half of soulful Spike that comes before that first. That was a really big step for him, and I thought it was awesome.

Spike has successfully manipulated her into feeling responsible for his soul.' => Seriously ?

And don't you think that it was just because she was in love (or falling in love at least) with him, rather than a malicious "˜manipulation' ?

I don't think it was malicious. I don't even think it was intentional or something he did consciously, but Buffy still felt responsible for him in the end because he told her he got his soul for her (and no, I'm not going to take his word for it, but I do believe he had really convinced himself it was true).

Spike has equally reasons to be angry, like Buffy has reasons to be. Spike really don't need to feel compassion at this point for a guy who just tried to kill him without valid reason at this moment of his life.

He still had no right to tell Wood that his mother never loved him. That was completely uncalled for.

If Spike wanted to, he would have remove the amulet and would have follow Buffy, like she was asking. But he didn't.

He chose to die, because he was feeling he needed to do this. Because he knew the World needed him to do this. And because he wanted to save the woman he loves. Actually, it was a pretty selfless act of heroism.

I'm still not convinced that he was physically capable of removing the amulet and running. Didn't he get burned when he touched it before it was even completely powered up? And there's still what he said about it in "Just Rewards". He blamed Angel for giving Buffy the amulet and then leaving town, even though Angel didn't really know what the amulet was for either and only left town because Buffy wanted him to get a second front ready.

Spike has years, and years, and years of hate of Angel(us) behind him. Because of Dru, because of Buffy, because of the way he treated his feelings and humiliated him"¦ It's ANGEL who begins to talk about Buffy, in order to HURT Spike. It was volunteer from his part.

What Angel says isn't disrespectful of Buffy. Spike, on the other hand, crudely boasts of his destructive S6 relationship with her just in order to hurt Angel back. Which undermines all the contrition and respect he showed her in season seven. And he disrespects whatever he and Buffy had in season seven by never contacting her to let her know he's alive.
 
Miss Kitty
Miss Kitty
Okay, I wrote a long answer, it took me hours, and the thread had been closed ; my answer is gone when I tried to post it. And right now, I want to kill myself for not record it... But I still disagree with your points ;)
The way Spike is acting now came with time, during all these years with Drusilla, Angelus and Darla. Spike was still able to love his mother after he turned into a vampire. But, as we see in Lies my parents told me, his mother wasn’t. He was hurt and jealous when Angelus slept with Drusilla, Angelus mocked him for his weakness.

What I’m trying to say is : Spike built a carapace through the years. He tries to play a role. This is not really wickedness, it actually is a protection. An apparence and protection he built for a long, long time. This is the way he acts, because he has been hurt a LOT of time when he opened himself to people as a sensitive and romantic guy. What did you expect ? The way he is now is perfectly and totally logical in my opinion.

Wait, wait, what? So Spike wasn't actually evil, he just pretended to be evil? Doesn't that make him all the more pathetic? I mean, if he is evil as every other vampire that's normal - you can't help being evil when lacking a soul. But if he could help it and was only killing and raping to get some respect from his fellow vampires than he is a whole new class of terrible, IMO. Even if you apply it only to Spike's rudeness, not his appetite for blood and destruction, it stil lmakes him extremely pathetic. "Oh, I will be mean to everyone because Angel was mean to me a century ago". Get over, it!

And what do you think of a vampire who prefer to die rather than hurt the person he loves by saying to a crazy Godess about the key ?

I think he was stalling for time. It's not as if Glory was going to let him go if he had spilled the beans.

What do you think about a vampire who cries (more than anybody else) after the death of the woman he loves?

I think he is a drama queen.

The difference with his love with Dru is, he suffers a lot, but even if he wants Buffy, even if she rejects him, he won’t doing a spell or anything like that to her.

You mean apart from trying to pull her "to the dark", trying to rape her, to make her quit her job, so she could be more dependent on him, kidnapping her and telling he would kill her if he doesn't love him, trying everything he could to break up her and Riley? Yes, he never really tries to force things with Buffy [/sarcasm]

Spike has equally reasons to be angry, like Buffy has reasons to be. Spike really don’t need to feel compassion at this point for a guy who just tried to kill him without valid reason at this moment of his life.

I don’t think that Spike would have reacted in an insensitive way if he had know it in another way.

Spike had all the time in the world to apologize to Wood. Not only does he not apologize but he continues wearing the coat he looted from the corpse of Wood's mother.

This is what he's saying in Destiny : "I fought for my soul. Went through the demon trials. Almost did me in a dozen times over, but I kept fighting. 'Cause I knew it was the right thing to do."

He says it so it must be true, is that it? Are we still talking about the queen of all drama queens? You don't really believe he would have admitted that the demon tricked him and gave him a soul instead of removing the chip even if that was the truth, do you?

Okay, when you read this, don’t you have the impression that he tries to convince himself ?

No. I think he was just being a drama queen.
 
Taaroko
Taaroko
Oh dear, we seem to have tag-teamed her. :P Great post.
I said I wouldn't go there, but I can't help it anymore. 🙂 I didn't respond to everything because the post would be FAR too long.

And here's where you lose me completely. How can Spike be different? What's this "human part" you think he has? He's soulless!

He isn't able to love--not truly and selflessly, because he lacks the required component, but he thinks he can because he can't feel the difference and he's able to romanticize his relationship with Drusilla.

In s2, the Judge points out, not only in Spike, but in Drusilla that there's humanity in them because they have affection for each other. They love each other. Dru reiterates this idea in "Crush." Buffy says vampires can't love without a soul. That is her whole belief because of her relationship with Angel. However, as Dru says, soulless vampires can love "quite well, if not wisely." Buffy also knew that Spike loved her when he was soulless (in his own twisted way) because she mentions it in "Conversations with Dead People." She also tells Spike that he faced "the monster inside him" and fought back. The human aspect of Spike and his ability to love is not coming out of left field. It based upon what the show offers.

But the fact remains throughout that he has no soul. He cannot be selfless.

I don't get this because Spike has shown that he can be selfless without a soul. He takes a beating from Glory in order to protect Dawn and Buffy. When he told Buffy (thinking she was the Buffybot) as to why Glory couldn't find out, he said it was because he couldn't bear to see Buffy in so much pain if anything happened to Dawn. If Spike was so selfish, wouldn't he have said, "Glory cannot never find out Dawn is the key because then Buffy would never love me or want to be with me." But, he didn't. His intentions and actions were completely selfless at that point.

Also, if Spike was so selfish without a soul, why stay with Dawn and the Scoobies after Buffy died? But, he made a promise to Buffy that he would protect Dawn. That's hardly selfish in my eyes, especially since Buffy died and Spike knew he couldn't be with Buffy.

It is impossible for him to truly change for the better at any deeper level than the surface because HE DOESN'T HAVE A SOUL. And would it really be better if he could? That would completely undermine all of the vamp lore of the Buffyverse. Souls=capacity for selflessness and goodness. Soulless demon=inherently evil. Which is why Buffy can stake vampires left and right without it being an ethical issue. If Spike can "evolve" to the point where he can be selfless and good without a soul, what's the point of a soul? And how do you justify all of the evil he did and still does? If he had it in him all along to change for the better, then you can't give him a pass for his evil just because he's soulless. And what about Buffy? Has she been slaying potential anti-heroes all this time?

If you try to make Spike into an exception, the entire Buffyverse falls apart. I can see why you'd want to allow him the capacity for real change, but I'm not willing to ignore the rules of the 'verse for one character.

The problem is that Spike is the only vampire without a soul we see in the Buffyverse try to be good. Plus, seeing Spike as the possible exception isn't throwing out the rules of the Buffyverse. IMO, it's actually understanding them more. In s1, we learn that once humans are sired, a demon takes over their body. I know not many people like the Angel/Spike comparisons, but it's the only way for me to explain my thoughts. When Angel was sired and became Angelus, there was no humanity in him. The Judge points this out in s2. However, when Spike (even Dru) were sired, there was still some humanity left in them (this human side), again as the Judge mentions in s2. So, in that sense, we learned something new about the process of humans being sired into vampires. They quite possibly can retain some humanity after being sired.

Spike is later the only vampire we see get a chip in his head that prevents from attacking humans. He is the exception here because it has never been established what a chip in a vampire's brain can do to them. When Dru comes back in "Crush," she tells him that he is actually a "bad dog," and not even a chip/science/electricity can prevent him from killing. Spike agrees and mentions to Harmony that he's back. The evil Spike that slaughtered half of Europe is back. Yet, when we get to the scene at the Bronze and Dru kills someone for Spike to drink, he's hesitant. Does he really want to go back to this lifestyle that he thought he wanted or does he really want to try and change? He gives into temptation tough and drinks the already dead person. I think this shows that even with the chip in his head, Spike could have gone back to Dru and killed others.

However, there's another twist in this episode. Spike wants to prove his love to Buffy by killing Drusilla. Of course, this isn't the right way to go about it, but what else can you expect from a soulless vampire who fell in love with a slayer? However, the fact that Spike was willing to choose Buffy over Dru, which included going back to that life of killing (even with the chip), says a lot to me about his identity and that he is an exception in the Buffyverse.

IMO, having a soul means having a conscience and having the ability to control your inner demons. It's quite poetic actually 😉 because isn't that what a conscience does? It helps you choose the path of right and wrong and when you feel guilty, you know you made the wrong choice. The same thing with a soul. Spike knew he couldn't be completely good without a soul because he had to control his demon. Furthermore, Buffy told him time and again that she couldn't love him because he didn't have a soul. So, it's only natural Spike would want to get a soul. He wanted to become the man Buffy deserved, while at the same time, control the demon literally inside him. I think Wesley explains this idea beautifully in AtS when he says (to Angel no less), "We know you're a man with a demon inside, not the other way around."

He still had no right to tell Wood that his mother never loved him. That was completely uncalled for.

But wasn't it true to some extent? I think that was the point of the scene. "Lies my parents told me." For slayers, the mission is what matters. Even slayers who have children, their slayer duties are priority. It's sad and unfortunate, but a slayer's focus has to be on the mission. And since I'm on the subject of Spike/Robin/Nikki, I don't see it cruel that Spike wore Nikki's jacket even when he had a soul. Buffy specifically told Spike that she wanted the Spike that was dangerous. The Spike that tried to kill her when they first met. Well, that Spike wore a long, leather coat. It was part of his identity. If Buffy wanted that Spike to help her in her war, then Spike was going to "get it done." And he needed his second skin to make that happen.

What Angel says isn't disrespectful of Buffy. Spike, on the other hand, crudely boasts of his destructive S6 relationship with her just in order to hurt Angel back. Which undermines all the contrition and respect he showed her in season seven. And he disrespects whatever he and Buffy had in season seven by never contacting her to let her know he's alive.

Back up a second. Who provoked who? Angel said Buffy could never really love Spike because he wasn't Angel. Both were pissed off at each other and both knew how to get under the other's skin. So, to piss off Angel, he said, "I guess she was thinking all about you, all those times I was putting it to her." I don't think it undermines it one bit because Spike was upset at Angel and knew how to provoke him back. And I don't see it was disrespectful that Spike never wanted to contact Buffy to tell her he was alive. Not many fans like it, but I think he wanted to actually respect what they did have and not ruin it.
 
S
soulunsung
[No message]
Miss Kitty
Miss Kitty
Great post ! I'm glad you give an answer, because it will took, like... 3 hours to do this with my translator, lol. I agree with you :D
X
xaphania
I love your posts so much! :D You say everything so well.
P
prophecygrrl
You deserve all the karma for this post too :heart:
Also, if Spike was so selfish without a soul, why stay with Dawn and the Scoobies after Buffy died?

Because he is a moron who couldn't decide what to do next?

He takes a beating from Glory in order to protect Dawn and Buffy. When he told Buffy (thinking she was the Buffybot) as to why Glory couldn't find out, he said it was because he couldn't bear to see Buffy in so much pain if anything happened to Dawn. If Spike was so selfish, wouldn't he have said, "Glory cannot never found Dawn is the key because then Buffy would never love me or want to be with me." But, he didn't. His intentions and actions were completely selfless at that point.

Or, you know, he realized it was Buffy and played along. I doubt the robot smells like Buffy. I know Jane "Spuffy" Espenson didn't intend the scene to be read that way but who cares...

The problem is that Spike is the only vampire without a soul we see in the Buffyverse try to be good. Plus, seeing Spike as the possible exception isn't throwing out the rules of the Buffyverse. IMO,

Yes, it is. Why? Because nobody seems all that surprised by that exception. Wondering whether there might be other exceptions? Purely the stuff of fanfiction. Wondering whether this didn't make Spike al lthe more guilty for his "soulless' deeds. Fanfiction.

But wasn't it true to some extent?

Maybe, maybe not. The point is Spike has no way of knowing one way or other.

Buffy specifically told Spike that she wanted the Spike that was dangerous. The Spike that tried to kill her when they first met. Well, that Spike wore a long, leather coat. It was part of his identity. If Buffy wanted that Spike to help her in her war, then Spike was going to "get it done." And he needed his second skin to make that happen.

Spike (supposedly) has a brain of his own. Whatever Buffy says he can decide whether to listen or not. If Buffy had old him she wanted him to murder somebody would he have gone along with that too?
 
I long for the brevity of former posts:

"Spike sucks!"
"No you suck!"

it made it much easier to read at work!
 
Because he is a moron who couldn't decide what to do next?

In your eyes 😉

Or, you know, he realized it was Buffy and played along. I doubt the robot smells like Buffy. I know Jane "Spuffy" Espenson didn't intend the scene to be read that way but who cares...

Spike's reaction when Buffy kissed him shows he did not know that it was the real Buffy. You may think he played along, but I completely disagree.

Yes, it is. Why? Because nobody seems all that surprised by that exception. Wondering whether there might be other exceptions? Purely the stuff of fanfiction. Wondering whether this didn't make Spike al lthe more guilty for his "soulless' deeds. Fanfiction.

The Spike haters don't see it as an exception. Other people do though.

Maybe, maybe not. The point is Spike has no way of knowing one way or other.

Again, whether Spike knew or not wasn't the point of the scene. The point was to show a slayer's duties come first, even the love of their own children.

Spike (supposedly) has a brain of his own. Whatever Buffy says he can decide whether to listen or not. If Buffy had old him she wanted him to murder somebody would he have gone along with that too?

Why do you think they bickered when Buffy called him out on his moping? Spike thought he had become the man Buffy wanted (and he did), but she also wanted that warrior inside Spike. The dangerous Spike that could kill a demon without getting a huge beating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom