yellowcrayon
Scooby
N.B. -- I'm putting this out where everybody can see it so that the grievances -- and any replies -- will be completely open and transparent. This way, nobody can complain they didn't hear anything, or that the story got warped in the retelling.
I am writing on behalf of The 29, and my other fellow members.
We, and many others (Harm's Way, Lemon, Floop695 etc.), see the sudden ban as both unfair and unnecessary. We are deeply saddened by what appears from our perspective to be a fault in the administration, and can only hope that things take a turn for the better.
Primarily, we feel hurt and confused about the reasoning behind the ban. We were told we "needed to take a time-out," but somehow this isn't supposed to be a punishment. With all due respect, that's a ridiculous statement. Any parent (or, indeed, forum admin) will tell you that a time-out is a punishment. You don't get a time-out unless you've done something wrong. This is particularly true here, since the only more extreme punishment -- let's call it what it is -- would be deleting our posts and/or accounts.
A ban is a ban. We're all reasonable adults here. If we've really done something wrong, if we've violated forum policy in some way, then we're more than willing to shut our mouths and take the ban like the grown-ups we are. But we deserve to know what we did.
Sweeping statements about "bullying," "infighting," and "nastyness [sic]" don't help us understand, especially when, for most of us, the ban came without any warning on the part of the mods. Many of us on the ban list pride ourselves on trying to be courteous, welcoming, and respectful. Please give specific instances of conduct that led to a given member's banning. Otherwise, to the world at large, it looks like you're suspiciously close to the very bullying and name-calling that you decry in others.
Justice is precise. Justice permits a hearing of the specific charges raised against an individual before that individual is punished.
Tyranny is dragging twenty-nine members out of their beds in the dead of night, saying "you're all traitors to the State," and shipping them all off to the Gulag. For just a little while. 'Cause it's not punishment, it's reeducation.
A silly simile? Maybe. Overdramatic? Probably. But it vividly illustrates the problem, from our perspective.
Each one of us just wants to know what specifically he or she did to deserve this. This isn't a rebellion. This isn't a refusal to accept any just punishment. This is only a petition for due process.
We love the administration. Really, we do. Which is why we want to give them the benefit of the doubt and wait for an explanation, even if it seems to us that the administration didn't extend us the same courtesy. The Golden Rule, y'know?
Thanks,
YC, the Twenty-Nine, and others
I am writing on behalf of The 29, and my other fellow members.
We, and many others (Harm's Way, Lemon, Floop695 etc.), see the sudden ban as both unfair and unnecessary. We are deeply saddened by what appears from our perspective to be a fault in the administration, and can only hope that things take a turn for the better.
Primarily, we feel hurt and confused about the reasoning behind the ban. We were told we "needed to take a time-out," but somehow this isn't supposed to be a punishment. With all due respect, that's a ridiculous statement. Any parent (or, indeed, forum admin) will tell you that a time-out is a punishment. You don't get a time-out unless you've done something wrong. This is particularly true here, since the only more extreme punishment -- let's call it what it is -- would be deleting our posts and/or accounts.
A ban is a ban. We're all reasonable adults here. If we've really done something wrong, if we've violated forum policy in some way, then we're more than willing to shut our mouths and take the ban like the grown-ups we are. But we deserve to know what we did.
Sweeping statements about "bullying," "infighting," and "nastyness [sic]" don't help us understand, especially when, for most of us, the ban came without any warning on the part of the mods. Many of us on the ban list pride ourselves on trying to be courteous, welcoming, and respectful. Please give specific instances of conduct that led to a given member's banning. Otherwise, to the world at large, it looks like you're suspiciously close to the very bullying and name-calling that you decry in others.
Justice is precise. Justice permits a hearing of the specific charges raised against an individual before that individual is punished.
Tyranny is dragging twenty-nine members out of their beds in the dead of night, saying "you're all traitors to the State," and shipping them all off to the Gulag. For just a little while. 'Cause it's not punishment, it's reeducation.
A silly simile? Maybe. Overdramatic? Probably. But it vividly illustrates the problem, from our perspective.
Each one of us just wants to know what specifically he or she did to deserve this. This isn't a rebellion. This isn't a refusal to accept any just punishment. This is only a petition for due process.
We love the administration. Really, we do. Which is why we want to give them the benefit of the doubt and wait for an explanation, even if it seems to us that the administration didn't extend us the same courtesy. The Golden Rule, y'know?
Thanks,
YC, the Twenty-Nine, and others
L
Lemon
[No message]
C
Crazy Flakes
[No message]
The Chosen
[No message]
T
TheReplacement
[No message]