The idea of renting instead of buying is something I find offensive. I bought second hand copies of Office and various Adobe Creative Suite software on eBay second hand. Totally legally, according to the sellers; I admit I had no interest in checking to be positive, especially when it comes to Adobe. Old for Office; very old for Creative Suite.
Adobe CS6 was the last time you could buy their software instead of renting it. Given that Creative Cloud came out in - checks - 2013, that means the software I am using lacks 13 years of updates. Updates that, according to Adobe, are needed. Yet I haven't needed them once. Now, admittedly I have only had them for a few years so I would have only spent a few hundred pounds in updates, but my experience shows that they aren't needed for me, probably no other amateur and likely not for various minor professionals. And I think that shows the real reason why they went to renting with updates instead of new software. Previously, someone could buy the software and use it for years and years without issue. All that money Adobe was missing... Now, with monthly rentals, customers become cash cows.
Of course, all this looks like it's going to cause issues for Adobe as their greed - you apparently have to pay a fee to stop paying the monthly fee - led to someone using AI to clone their software. And distribute it for free.
You can only gouge and control for so long before people find replacements or workarounds, legal or not. This goes double for now the internet has so many tools to do things for which one might once have had to take classes. And tools to accomplish it, many actually legal.
My artwork software is less sophisticated but does all the things i need to do. Most of it is cheap or free and all of it resides on my own computer.
I never upgraded adobe's pdf reader. I have other software that reads and writes pdfs now so i no longer need care about if i have online access when i have work to do.
My back ups are fire proof drives, not the cloud where an organization i was part of lost over 20,000 of my images after moving to the cloud for "safety" and "convenience".
Because i am paranoid, I had backed up a lot of it to my hard drives where what is left it is no longer easily available to others, but the organization saves money? (shrug) The rest of us peons transfer huge amounts of data in various inconvenient ways.
None of us trusts the "new" cloud convenience. But the company got rid of their (stable, well maintained) servers that also managed their financial side flawlessly for years...
Funny thing, cloud storage companies are nowhere as motivated to care about individual servers the way creators & owners always are. For them it is just rental propery.
One unseen consequence of using cloud storage and software is that some of us do not always live on the grid. It is quite possible (sometimes desirable) to be offline but still have power to run a laptop.
Possession (of my own creative work) is 9/10ths of my sanity.